SLB Open Forum: 2011 Schedules

Now that the divisions have been officially announced, the newest point of contention for the 2011 season is scheduling.

In an effort to make things as balanced as possible, I’ve set it up so that everyone plays the six teams in their division twice apiece. The other remaining ten games are split among the seven teams in the other division.

Obviously, this leaves a disparity in the number of games each team will have against non-division squads. Each team currently plays three non-division clubs twice and the other four non-division teams once apiece.

The move to fourteen teams no longer allows us to play an even number of games against every team, there’s nothing we can do about that. There does, however, seem to be some rumblings about which teams people have to play twice.

The non-division half of everyone’s schedule is currently randomized. I could make some changes, but in doing so, we’re effectively stacking the deck—on purpose—against certain teams if we try to balance out the perceived inequities of an unbalanced schedule.

There is no perfect way to set this schedule up.

The only two real options are as follows:

1) Leave the schedule as it is, wherein the interdivisional teams play each other twice and the non-divisional portion is randomized.

2) Randomize the entire schedule, thus not-ensuring an even number of games against interdivisional clubs, but ensuring a completely random and unbiased scheduling result.

I’m only offering this up because it seems some people suspect that I may have stacked the schedule in my favor. I’m not going to lie, that’s a bit of a kick in the balls given my fairly solid record as a fair commissioner over the years, but I understand why people might think what they think, so I’m leaving it up to y’all.

Here is the current Regular Season Matchup Matrix.

This chart shows the number of times each team faces off against the other in the regular season.

If you think that the schedule is wholly unbalanced in one (or many) team’s favor(s), let me know. I can make some adjustments, but ensuring that a perceived “bad team” gets two matchups against all of the perceived “good teams” from a different division is really only stacking the deck against them and that seems equally unfair.

Personally, I’m down with the randomized non-division portion of the schedule. One might say it is because I have a seemingly favorable non-divisional slate of games.

Well for a quick recap, I went 4-9-1 against the entire Pacific Division in the regular season last year.

That includes getting swept in the regular season series by Morgan (one of the teams I’m slated to play twice) and splitting the season series with John and Adam (the other two teams I’m slated to matchup with twice).

So if anyone thinks I’d be fattening up my win totals, recent history proves otherwise.

If you want to take a peek at your tentative schedules, you can do so by going to the league home on Yahoo! and clicking the schedule link.

If someone can give me a legitimate grievance that warrants changing the schedule—and not just nitpicking about the perceived strength of your schedule—I’ll consider making the change to a completely randomized schedule

Speak now or (hopefully) forever hold your peace.


12 thoughts on “SLB Open Forum: 2011 Schedules

  1. Steven February 28, 2011 / 11:30 pm

    Haha. Soooooo…I never meant for this to actually get to a debate. I merely attempted to make a joke. I’m presuming Justin was also doing the same thing while complaining about his fate.

    This is definitely the most favorable situation. You just happened to have, what is perceived to be, a positive outcome.

    Now, stop cheating Mr. Commish ;)


    • Jeremiah Graves March 1, 2011 / 10:41 am

      Yeah, I didn’t figure anyone was really serious about it, but since it had come up from about three people now (all Kunkels…shocking) that I should at least throw it out there as a talking point.


  2. bentnails March 1, 2011 / 12:21 am

    If anyone wants I will trade a match up with John for one with Mike. I figure why take the easy road. If you think your going to win atleast make it a challenge.


    • Jeremiah Graves March 1, 2011 / 10:36 am

      I like your balls to the wall approach.

      It’ll be interesting come draft day to see if you’re all talk or if you’ve brought some legit a-game this year. I’m excited.


  3. mike March 1, 2011 / 11:05 am

    wait THREE kunkels bitching about the schedule…all i want is to play John man after he has become completely disinterested in the league and not week 1. Is that such a bad thing to ask? Also and I am being completely honest here. No one in the salmon league scares me as a match up. So If I play graves 24 times or if I play everyone an equal amount I am still making the playoffs fellas. No bitches here. Heck I didn’t even think it was that favorable of a matchup for Graves. someone has to play those guys twice.


  4. Steven Kunkel March 1, 2011 / 2:01 pm

    Who in the H-E-Triple hockey sticks is Bentnails?!?!


  5. Steven Kunkel March 1, 2011 / 2:02 pm

    Jesse!!! :D

    I should have clicked his link to his blog :D


  6. Craig March 1, 2011 / 2:15 pm

    um I need a beer….


  7. Justin March 19, 2011 / 1:09 pm

    I do not like the schedule, I’m sorry but I feel like I have been dealt an unfair hand, and in this league we take fairness very, very seriously. I do not like the fact that I am paying to play the top teams in league last year 8 times, and I know its tough to perceive who is going to be the better teams until the draft, but given certain track records it seems as though the shit stick hit me really hard..I know I’ve made it to the playoffs quite a few times, but given this schedule I feel that I don’t even have a chance and that is not going to be any fun for me watching my team lose and lose and lose…I guess by now I should tell you that I am fucking with you, I love me some great challenges, and everybody is equally getting their asses pounded by me this year


Lemme hear it...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s